partnerdanceonline.com
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 24, 2013, 06:35:02 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Smiley Smiley Cheesy  Phew, that was scary!
Everything OK again... Smiley Grin Grin
110043 Posts in 1724 Topics by 215 Members
Latest Member: phoenix13
* Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
+  partnerdanceonline.com
|-+  Partner Dancing
| |-+  Dancesport
| | |-+  College Teams (Moderators: QPO, Rugby, ZPomeroy)
| | | |-+  Peer coaching -- good or bad?
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Peer coaching -- good or bad?  (Read 24 times)
phoenix13
Open Bronze
*
Posts: 894



« on: May 18, 2013, 10:06:40 AM »

A lot of college teams simply don't have the resources to pay for regular, professional coaching. As a result,many teams use more experienced team members as peer teachers/coaches of beginner team members, thereby saving lots of cash while providing instruction for newer members of the teams.

Have you experienced this?  Or, even if not, what do you think are possible pros ad cons of such a set-up?  Ar there other alternatives for getting effective instruction for college teams?
Logged

Dona nobis pacem.
millitiz
Intermediate Bronze

Posts: 131


« Reply #1 on: May 18, 2013, 10:48:38 PM »

Yes, I "grew up" with such system. Well, a bit of a hybrid, I guess.

One of the main benefits is of course the money. Student instructors are far cheaper. Also, the student instructor could teach some "mundane work" (such as routines/steps, basic techniques) so that when the pro comes, s/he could work on the more important issues instead of using the precious time to teach steps. Ideally, we would like to have pros at our side for all lessons, and practices. But seriously, it is really quite a waste of pros' time.

And if you are fortunate enough to have a high level student instructor (let's say prechamp, champ level), then one could learn a lot of things. I was fortunate to experience such group lessons. The instructor was a prechamp latin dancer. While she is an Asian (American), she taught the class in the "Russian style": which involves lots of yelling, shouting, pushing, drills, and sweat Wink. I improved so much during that semester/year and I am very grateful for those "boot camps". I think some pushing really helps us to get better faster.

Of course, there is always the fear that the instructor could teach something wrong. But since they basically only teach simple things, they can't get all too wrong. I mean, a heel lead is a heel lead. You can't go way too wrong on that.
Logged
QPO
Moderator
National Champion
****
Posts: 19975


Adelaide South Australia


« Reply #2 on: May 19, 2013, 03:37:36 AM »

well I believe that Arthur Murray principle was that the teacher was not that far ahead of the student. I believe the best thing you can do for a beginner is give them the road map, which is what often the associate coach does. When they student has progressed then move them on to someone more advanced. It can save people a lot of money  and the more experienced coach can spend their time better is finessing/grooming the next level dancer.
Logged

Dance is a delicate balance between perfection and beauty.  ~Author Unknown
Dance Forum
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!