partnerdanceonline.com
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
November 26, 2014, 11:24:21 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
A lot of people are visiting Smiley Smiley
Undecided Undecided but not many are posting....
please say hi Cheesy
116515 Posts in 1857 Topics by 223 Members
Latest Member: dancewithmetoronto
* Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
+  partnerdanceonline.com
|-+  Partner Dancing
| |-+  Dancesport
| | |-+  Dancesport organizations (Moderators: QPO, Rugby, Lioness, ZPomeroy)
| | | |-+  WDC vs WDSF
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] Print
Author Topic: WDC vs WDSF  (Read 11712 times)
QPO
Moderator
Continental Champion
****
Posts: 20842


Adelaide South Australia


« Reply #75 on: November 13, 2014, 09:16:59 PM »

Learnts something new today when arranging numbers for competitors you cannot start below 10 for WDSF events it is a rule.... Tongue why I don't know perhaps it is for the numbering system.

I think the 'below 10' rule has always been there.  I suspect its because it might be seen as visual bias if one couple had '1' on their back! 


Possible. we have those numbers and I usually given then to the Juvenile couples Cheesy
Logged

Dance is a delicate balance between perfection and beauty.  ~Author Unknown
Dance Forum
elisedance
Administrator
Blackpool Finalist
*****
Posts: 35037


ee


« Reply #76 on: November 18, 2014, 04:44:08 PM »

This all seems to get more confusing.

One thing - WDC has a new website but I don't think they tested it on a laptop - the banner is so wide you can't access some of the dropdowns!  For example, I can't look at the professional ballroom rankings without searching for it on google.  They should shoot their web-designer....
Logged

If you must leave the house, go build a home...

The limit of your love is also the limit of your art...
elisedance
Administrator
Blackpool Finalist
*****
Posts: 35037


ee


« Reply #77 on: November 18, 2014, 04:44:40 PM »

Learnts something new today when arranging numbers for competitors you cannot start below 10 for WDSF events it is a rule.... Tongue why I don't know perhaps it is for the numbering system.

I think the 'below 10' rule has always been there.  I suspect its because it might be seen as visual bias if one couple had '1' on their back! 


Possible. we have those numbers and I usually given then to the Juvenile couples Cheesy

Better give the 1 to the weakest couple Wink
Logged

If you must leave the house, go build a home...

The limit of your love is also the limit of your art...
QPO
Moderator
Continental Champion
****
Posts: 20842


Adelaide South Australia


« Reply #78 on: November 23, 2014, 10:48:34 PM »

Learnts something new today when arranging numbers for competitors you cannot start below 10 for WDSF events it is a rule.... Tongue why I don't know perhaps it is for the numbering system.

I think the 'below 10' rule has always been there.  I suspect its because it might be seen as visual bias if one couple had '1' on their back!  


Possible. we have those numbers and I usually given then to the Juvenile couples Cheesy

Better give the 1 to the weakest couple Wink

well that would make them feel special Cheesy

« Last Edit: November 24, 2014, 06:48:06 AM by elisedance » Logged

Dance is a delicate balance between perfection and beauty.  ~Author Unknown
Dance Forum
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!